MirGeneDB ID | Efe-Mir-92-o40 |
Family name |
MIR-92 (all species) |
Seed |
AUUGCAC |
Species |
Common brandling worm (Eisenia fetida) |
MiRBase ID |
|
Paralogues |
Efe-Mir-92-o39
|
Orthologues |
Asu-Mir-92
Cel-Mir-92
Esc-Mir-92
Gsp-Mir-92
Hmi-Mir-92
Isc-Mir-92
Obi-Mir-92
Sme-Mir-92
Snu-Mir-92-o40
|
Node of Origin (locus) |
E. fetida
|
Node of Origin (family) |
Bilateria
|
Genome context (Efe_combined) |
Efet.01.539975: 113-174 [+]
|
Precursor (pre-Mir +30nt flank) |
CGCUUUAAUACGUCUAUGAAUGCCGUCGGUGGGUUGUGACUGGAGCAAUCUGUUACCUCUGCUUGAAUCAAAUUGCACUAGUCCCGGCCUGCUGACUGCAGAUCCAUCGUGACUGCAGCAGU
Get precursor sequence
|
Structure | 10 20 30 40 50 60
CGCUUUAAUACGUCUAU- A-| C UG U A C UUACCUC
GA UGC GUCGG GGUUG GACUGG GCAAU UG U
CU ACG CAGUC CCGGC CUGAUC CGUUA AC G
UGACGACGUCAGUGCUAC AG^ U GU C A A UAAGUUC
120 110 100 90 80 70 |
Deep sequencing |
Go to detailed chart
|
Comment | It is not clear either from phylogenetic or syntenic information how many Mir-92 genes were present in the last common ancestor of bilaterians and how the vertebrate Mir-92s relate to the invertebrate Mir-92s and thus these multiple paralogues in invertebrates are classified here as orphans pending additional data. Also there is a second Drosha cut -1 relative to hwat is annotated here. |
3' NTU |
No
|
Motifs | UG at 5p(-14) |
Tissue expression
|
|
Star sequence |
Efe-Mir-92-o40_5p* |
mirBase accession | None |
Sequence |
0- GGGUUGUGACUGGAGCAAUCUG -22
Get sequence
|
Mature sequence |
Efe-Mir-92-o40_3p |
mirBase accession | None |
Sequence |
40- AAUUGCACUAGUCCCGGCCUGC -62
Get sequence
|